Tudor's Ranger and Rolex's Explorer I can be said to share the same birth background, both are designed to assist mankind to complete the extreme adventure journey. The difference is that the Explorer I went to Mount Everest in 1953, and the Ranger went to the North Pole in 1952（TUDOR 1926 M91351-0002）, in short, there is no such thing as the coldest place on earth, only the colder! At that time, there was no such name as Ranger, it was a watch called Oyster Prince code name 7808, which can be regarded as the predecessor of Ranger. It wasn't until 1965 that the Oyster Prince Ranger 7995 was introduced, which officially had the shape of the modern Ranger.

We can carry out clearly see some new Ranger enterprise compared to the previous generations, the overall design modeling ability obvious problem become able to have more strong, dial layout in the continuation of the development before the need to be simple and easy to read on the basis of the hour markers, pointers, scales are also in line with the fine-tuning of the luminous effective management of the area, it can be said to be the Ranger's core value of the appeal - -pragmatism continue to learn to carry forward the Chinese light. The new Ranger's diameter is 39 mm, although the country compared to the previous generation of Ranger 95760 41 mm size is a little smaller, but compared to the new exploration of the size of a 36 mm but TUDOR Ranger M79950-0003 has a great influence on the advantages of the 36 mm men's belt, to be honest, 36 mm men's belt is indeed a little small, in addition, the new Ranger 11 mm thickness in the wrist perfect fit at the same time they have been for the economic and practical technology has a social security more than one.

The new Ranger can have such thickness, mainly due to the use of the same 54 series movement and the lead submarine 39, the difference is only the Ranger's 5402 caliber diameter of 26 mm, the lead submarine 39 of the 5400 caliber diameter of 30.3 mm, the rest of the performance parameters are exactly the same, such as straddling the pendulum plate, no cardinal weights fine-tuning balance wheel, silicium hairspring, bi-directional winding, 70 hours of kinetic reserve and the observatory certification. One of the characteristics of Tudor's movements is that you can't see any decorative polishing on the movement, so it may not be as appealing to the "face" crowd, but for the "performance-oriented" me, I naturally have an inexplicable affinity for the straddle bridge version of the movement, firstly because of its symmetry, and secondly because at least it looks good. Firstly, because of its symmetry, and secondly, because TUDOR Ranger M79950-0002 at least looks tough!

So when it comes to Tudor movements, my first feeling is that they provide me with a strong sense of security and allow me to use them without fear or favor. The Tudor Ranger steel chain model is priced at 22,900 and the tape and fabric strap version is 20,500, my recommendation is to get the steel chain because if it has the more practical 8mm length as well as the adjustment. My point of view for this product price point of the Chinese Ranger is that it may not be that highest value, top of the line configuration of other watches in its class, but it develops certainly not that place the most down to earth watch in its class for you to wear.